Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Neither Poverty Nor Riches: a Few More Quotes

From the book Neither Poverty Nor Riches: A Biblical Theology of Material Possessions by Craig L. Blomberg:

  • “Thus it is clear that the man [the rich fool in Luke 12] is condemned not just for being rich. Still, it is important for professing Christians today to ask themselves how many unused surplus goods, property or investments they accumulate without any thought for the needy of our world. If the parallels become too close, presumably Jesus would say that their professions of faith are vacuous.” (119)

  • “Self-justification or rationalization of one’s attachment or material possessions continues to trouble those in every age of human history, including those who, like most Pharisees in Jesus’ day, are also generous in giving to charity. Only God knows a person’s true motives.” (123)

  • “The parables always contain a spiritual dimension relating to Christian discipleship, forgiveness, salvation by grace, and the like, as the primary foci of God’s kingdom or dynamic reign. But this discipleship will inevitably produce a tangible impact in the area of stewardship of material possessions.” (126)

  • “There is no indication in any of Jesus’ stories that this kind of stewardship can ever be quantified or that any economic reversals would ever lead to pure egalitarianism. But it is clear that Jesus believes there extremes of riches and poverty that are intolerable in the circle of his followers.” (127)

  • “The principles of the Sermon on the Mount/Plain are meant not as a constitution for government or merely as a guideline for individuals, but as a manifesto for those already willing to follow Jesus in the context of ‘church’.” (128)

  • “Both versions of the sermon begin with the beatitudes, and the beatitudes commence with Jesus declaring the ‘poor’ to be blessed. The Greek word ptochos is the term that referred to someone not just below the poverty-line but utterly destitute.” (128)

  • “All of this suggests that Jesus was not commanding, either in his day or in ours, that his followers necessarily give all beggars everything they demand. What is best for them is not always what they request. But to the extent we can determine people’s genuine physical or material needs, we should be concerned to point them towards the kind of help that stands a reasonable chance of remedying the situation.” (130)

  • “Jesus is not teaching that we can never store or safeguard possessions, but we must scrupulously determine which are really necessary.” (131)

  • “Thus, when we come to Mark 10:21b, we must be sure to read all of it. The command to sell everything and give to the poor cannot be separated from the accompanying, climactic command, ‘Then come follow me.’ The only charity that counts is what comes as the price of discipleship.” (139)

  • “Zacchaeus comes to salvation not by his stewardship, but by his encounter with the Son of Man.” (141)

  • “The good news of the gospel is consistently holistic, according to the teaching of Jesus. Material sustenance without spiritual salvation proves meaningless, but the liberation that God in Christ grants regularly includes a physical or material dimension to it as well. The only way God’s people can consistently obey all of his commands is as the entire Christian community worldwide, and any local expression of it, increasingly captures the vision of sharing its resources with the needy in its midst.” (145)

  • “Nevertheless, there is a clear emphasis in Jesus’ ministry and teaching on meeting the needs of the outcasts and have-nots of this world.” (145)

  • “It goes too far to say that one cannot be rich and be a disciple of Jesus, but what never appears in the Gospels are well-to-do followers of Jesus who are not simultaneously generous in almsgiving and in divesting themselves of surplus wealth for the sake of those in need.” (145)

  • “The covenant model that assumes material reward for piety never appears in Jesus’ teaching, and is explicitly contradicted throughout.” (145)

3 comments:

  1. Again, a number of outstanding quotes. I like the one piece about "including those who, like most Pharisees in Jesus’ day, are also generous in giving to charity". There is a certain local Christian who owns a large number of exotic cars, but also donates copious cash to Christian activities. However, does his giving excuse his excess in the light of the poverty around him?

    I also feel that he has tempered some of these comments to not offend, but almost contradicted himself in doing so. For example, he says "there are extremes of riches and poverty that are intolerable in the circle of his followers". The use of the word 'extreme' serves to allow the reader to justify their own position. This is similar to the comment where he says that we can determine what is 'necessary' for us to store-up, very open to interpretation/excuses.

    His weakest statement I felt was: “All of this suggests that Jesus was not commanding, either in his day or in ours, that his followers necessarily give all beggars everything they demand. What is best for them is not always what they request. But to the extent we can determine people’s genuine physical or material needs, we should be concerned to point them towards the kind of help that stands a reasonable chance of remedying the situation.” Again, personal responsibility is taken away in that we should point them to help, rather than personally journeying with them in their experiences of poverty.

    The rest are a great challenge to our generation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You said: For example, he says "there are extremes of riches and poverty that are intolerable in the circle of his followers".

    That is not at all what the quote says. Read it. It says "But it is clear that Jesus believes there are extremes of riches and poverty that are intolerable in the circle of his followers." He is stating what the biblical evidence indicates Jesus believes about extremes of riches and poverty. And he gives biblical examples to confirm his point.

    As to your point about people justifying their own position, unless you can come up with some concrete numbers or percentages from the Bible than you will only be justifying your own position as well.

    You said: Again, personal responsibility is taken away in that we should point them to help, rather than personally journeying with them in their experiences of poverty.

    I don't think he is removing personal responsibility. He indicates that 'we', as in Christ's followers, should point the poor to the kind of help that remedies the situation; that help could very well be help which includes the personal responsibility of the aforementioned followers 'journeying with' the poor. His focus in this quote is clearly on 'remedying' the situation as opposed to the methods of doing so. I will keep an eye open for any quotes which indicate how he thinks the problem should be remedied.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great post Jude. Rolled through this scripture in my devotions recently..I Tm 6:17-18
    As for the rich in this present age, charge them not to be haughty, nor to set their hopes on the uncertainty of riches, but on God, who richly provides us with everything to enjoy. They are to do good, to be rich in good works, to be generous and ready to share thus storing up treasures for themselves as a good foundation for the future, so that they may take hold of that which is truly life.

    ReplyDelete